Explaining Arguments with Background Knowledge

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Representing Arguments as Background Knowledge for Constraining Generalisation

The use of statistical measures to constrain generalisa-tion in learning systems has proved successful in many domains, but can only be applied where large numbers of examples exist. In domains where few training examples are available, other mechanisms for constraining gener-alisation are required. In this paper, we propose a representation of background knowledge based on arguments for and ag...

متن کامل

Representing Arguments as Background Knowledge for Constraining Gereralisation

The use of statistical measures to constrain generalisa-tion in learning systems has proved successful in many domains, but can only be applied where large numbers of examples exist. In domains where few training examples are available, other mechanisms for constraining gener-alisation are required. In this paper, we propose a representation of background knowledge based on arguments for and ag...

متن کامل

Explaining Data Patterns Using Background Knowledge from Linked Data

When using data mining to find regularities in data, the obtained results (or patterns) need to be interpreted. The explanation of such patterns is achieved using the background knowledge which might be scattered among different sources. This intensive process is usually committed to the experts in the domain. With the rise of Linked Data and the increasing number of connected datasets, we assu...

متن کامل

Using arguments for making and explaining decisions

Article history: Received 8 November 2006 Received in revised form 13 November 2008 Accepted 17 November 2008 Available online 24 November 2008

متن کامل

Towards explaining rebuttals in security arguments

The satisfaction of software security requirements can be argued using supporting facts and domain assumptions. Sometimes, these facts or assumptions may be questioned, as more knowledge about vulnerabilities becomes available. This results in rebuttals that can be derived from the new information. In this paper, we outline an extension of our OpenArgue tool with an explanation facility that ma...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Datenbank-Spektrum

سال: 2020

ISSN: 1618-2162,1610-1995

DOI: 10.1007/s13222-020-00348-6